China’s Spokesperson Identifies Physical Economy: “It’s about making people’s lives better”

 

Examine the exponential growth of electricity in China in a mere forty years.
China, in 2000 had zero high-speed rail trains, in 2025 it has 50,000 kilometers of rail, more than the rest of the world combined.

August 28, 2026

The true measurement of an economy is not money, not macro statistics, not stock market indexes: it is the improvement in the material standard of living of the population. Liu Chang, Spokesperson for the China Embassy, speaking on July 31, described the elementary metric of economic development: It’s about making people’s lives better.

As the Chinese understand very well, a key factor in improving the standard of living of its population, requires massive infrastructure investments. The Chinese government are unsurpassed, among all nations of the world, in expanding vital categories of infrastructure that are indispensable to increasing the productivity of their entire economy. As African nations have experienced, without infrastructure, especially electricity and rail, real economic growth will be thwarted, if not impossible. Examine the two graphs above. These images are startling. However, they should not be shocking. For the last two generations China has concentrated on industrializing its economy, becoming  the leading nation in manufacturing, ship building and the refinement of critical minerals. This has resulted in lifting 700 million of its people from abject poverty and improving the standard of living for all members of its society. China is committed to assisting the Global South, which encompasses the majority of the world’s population, land mass, and minerals. As the U.S. led Western alliance of nations thrash about in their collapsing rules-based order, China and the Global South can create a new system, a new paradigm of political-economic relationships premised on a common share future of economic development for mankind.

The presentation below is reprinted from the August 21, 2026 issue of Executive Intelligence Review magazine,

From a Grain of Rice to a World of Greater Equality—China and the Global South: A Story of Shared Development

Liu Chang, Spokesperson for China Embassy

by Liu Chang, July 31, 2026

Ladies and Gentlemen, first of all, I want to say thank you to the Schiller Institute for inviting me. It’s my real pleasure to join you today. Today’s topic is “A Dialogue of Civilizations: Development or World War III,” so I will emphasize the part of development, and share some thoughts of how China sees global development. My title is “China and the Global South: A Story of Shared Development.”

When it comes to development, people tend to think of GDP, investment, or massive infrastructure projects. But for most families, development looks much simpler. It means having lights during the night; roads remaining open through the rainy season; a doctor available when someone falls ill; a young person learning skills that lead to a decent job. These may sound like ordinary things, but that’s exactly what development is about. It’s not about making the numbers look better; it’s about making people’s lives better. Development matters when a family can feel the difference, and when an entire community can share in its benefits.

Not long ago, I read a story about farmers in Madagascar planting hybrid rice developed in China. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, these varieties can produce between 9 and 11 tons of rice per hectare, compared with about 2.8 tons for traditional local varieties. Those figures are more than statistics. To a local farmer, they could mean something more tangible; fuller granaries, a little more income, and a better chance of keeping a child in school.

So, what can a single grain of rice tell us? It reminds us that development cooperation is only meaningful if it improves ordinary lives. And in today’s inter-connected world, it raises four larger questions: How do we make development more inclusive? How do we protect it with lasting peace? How do we enable different civilizations to learn from one another? And how do we build a fairer system of global governance? These are exactly the questions that China has been seeking to answer.

China’s Four Global initiatives

First, how can the fruits of development benefit more people? China proposed the Global Development Initiative in 2021. Under the initiative, more than $23 billion have been mobilized and over 1,800 cooperation projects launched. But numbers alone do not tell the whole story. The more important question is whether these efforts can change people’s lives for the better. In Madagascar, as I mentioned earlier, change means higher yields from the hybrid rice. In Papua New Guinea, change could be a stand of Juncao grass allowing small farmers to grow edible mushrooms without cutting down forests, while creating new sources of income. Or it could be a Luban workshop in Kazakhstan, where local students learn practical skills in areas such as renewable energy, automation, and rail transportation based on the needs of local industries.

What China seeks is not simply to deliver a project and move on. It is to work with local partners to develop skills, share appropriate technologies, and create opportunities that can take root, continue to grow, and benefit local communities over the long term.

Rice is flourishing in Madagascar, the island nation which now has Africa’s largest area cultivating high-yield, hybrid rice. In 2007, China launched the hybrid rice demonstration center project in Madagascar, one of 10 such ag-tech specialty centers across the continent.FAO/Mijoro

 Rice is flourishing in Madagascar, the island nation which now has Africa’s largest area cultivating high-yield, hybrid rice. In 2007, China launched the hybrid rice demonstration center project in Madagascar, one of 10 such ag-tech specialty centers across the continent.

Second, what protects the gains of development? For many developing countries, security means far more than the absence of war. It also means hospitals can continue to operate during floods, droughts, or public health crises. It means stable access to food and energy. It means having the resilience to emerge from challenges. A war can destroy a school overnight. A severe natural disaster or public health emergency can set back the development of an entire community for years.

This is why China proposed the Global Security Initiative in 2022. It calls for a vision of security that is common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable. It emphasizes resolving differences through dialogue and consultation, while also addressing global challenges such as food security, energy security, public health, and climate change. Peace is the foundation on which development grows. And development itself can help address the root causes of conflict and instability, creating stronger foundations for lasting peace.

Third, can different paths of development respect and enrich one another? China’s answer is yes. Every country has its own history, culture, and path of development. Cooperation should not begin with the assumption that one country must first become a copy of another. True civilizational exchange is not about one side changing the other, nor replacing the other. It is about learning from each other with equality and respect, drawing inspiration from different experiences, and allowing diverse civilizations to grow together through dialogue rather than compete through exclusion.

In 2023, China proposed the Global Civilization Initiative, which recognizes that the greatest value of mutual learning between civilizations is not to erase differences, but to make those differences a starting point for mutual understanding and mutual reinforcement.

Last but not the least, who should shape global rules, and whom should those rules serve? Today, the contribution of the Global South to global development continues to grow. Yet in some international institutions, its representation and voice remain limited.

In 2025, China proposed the Global Governance Initiative, which emphasizes sovereign equality, the rule of international law, multilateralism, a people-centered approach, and action-oriented cooperation. The goal is not to tear down the existing international system or start over from scratch. Rather, it is to make that system more representative, more effective, and better able to respond to the concerns of developing countries. Global rules should be shaped through the participation of more countries, not written by a few and simply accepted by the rest. The affairs of the world should be discussed and decided together. And the benefits of development should be shared by all.

These four Global Initiatives reflect China’s vision for the future of our world: development gives people hope; security protects that hope; civilizations help us understand one another; and governance provides fairer institutions for shared progress.

From Poverty to Development

China has always been a member of the Global South. We have experienced the long journey from poverty to development, and we understand that there is no single model for modernization, nor any shortcut that can simply be copied and pasted. China is willing to share its experience, but not turn that experience into a prescription for others. We are willing to provide support, but not make decisions on behalf of our partners. We are willing to build bridges, roads, and hospitals, but we also want to work with countries around the world to develop the talent that allows people to shape their own future.

China looks forward to continuing to work with countries around the world so that development is no longer the privilege of a few, but a right shared by all; so that modernization is not painted in a single color, but reflects a landscape of diverse paths and possibilities; and so that every country and every people can take part in shaping our shared future.

Thank you very much.

Read below my earlier post on this topic.

Will China’s Global Governance Initiative Replace The West’s Failed “Rules Based Order?

Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.comalso publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the Worldand on X @lkfreemansafrica

We Can Eliminate Poverty & Hunger in Africa in One Generation With A “Credit Bank”

April 10, 2026-Lawrence Freeman speaking at a forum sponsored by “Watch Democracy Grow,” at the National Press Club in Washington DC.

April 20, 2026

Watch my presentation in which I presented a brief overview of the necessity for the long overdue industrialization of Africa. This would require massive investments in infrastructure, especially in the manufacturing sector. Colonialism, neocolonialism, and the inadequacy l of the global financial institutions, have deprived Africa of these basic elementary building blocks for a developing economy.

I have discussed for many years the necessity of having an institution dedicated to issuing credit for infrastructure. In consultation with my African friends and colleagues we understand the need for the creation of an African infrastructure Development Bank. This institution would have only one lending purpose: providing long-term, low-interest credits for infrastructure. It would be prohibited from paying other outstanding debts or other expenses unrelated to this single objective. The need for such a credit bank is that there are no other financial institutions that will fund long-term investments in infrastructure. The private sector is not capable of making such investments. Although they can make significant contributions to the process of expanding the productive capacity of African economies. Historically, economic development has taken place with state-led industrialization. This has been the case in Europe, Asia, and the United States. The contributions of Alexander Hamilton and Sun Yat sun are exemplary.

Public or government backed credits can be allocated for low interest-rates for long-term loans necessary for infrastructure, particularly in the energy and transportation sectors.

I know that without this credit generating  institution of development credits, African nations will not be capable of providing for the daily needs of its citizens. President Franklin Roosevelt understood this. That is why he advocated at the Bretton Woods Conference in July 1944, for the creation of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Sadly, his policies died with him on April 12, 1945. Read: Franklin Roosevelt Intended to Industrialize the ‘Global South’: The Case of Ethiopia

Let me be absolutely clear. Without such a credit bank providing investments in essential, elementary infrastructure, Africa will not become industrialized. Thus, abandoning African nations to be plagued with the failure of abject poverty. However, with such a properly administered credit institution, we can eliminate hunger and poverty in African nations in one generation.

Read below, my previous articles on this topic:

Presidents Roosevelt and Xi Would Have Agreed on Developing the Global South

A Hamiltonian Development Policy for Africa Is A Necessity

For the Development of Africa: Know and Apply Franklin Roosevelt’s Credit Policy

Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for over 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.comalso publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the Worldand on X @lkfreemansafrica

Energy, Agriculture and Manufacturing: Essential for Ethiopia’s Economic Future

Lawrence Freeman visiting Friendship Park in Addis Ababa on his first day in Ethiopia.

HORN REVIEW: IDEAS CONNECTIONS SYNERGY SIXTEENTH EDITION: Grand Narratives as Foundational Constructs of Ethiopia’s Foreign Policy

Lawrence Freeman is a distinguished researcher and analyst with over 30 years of experience specializing in the social, political, and economic dynamics of the African continent. Freeman has dedicated significant attention to Ethiopia, producing a wealth of insightful commentaries on the country’s evolving challenges and opportunities. Interview by Horn Review, was conducted during Mr. Freeman’s visit to Ethiopia (May 12-25, 2025)

“GERD, Agricultural Reforms and the Future of Regional Integration in the Horn of Africa”

Horn Review: Professor Freeman, welcome to our podcast. Great to have you here. Lawrence Freeman: Thank you very much.

Horn Review: From your perspective, how would you assess the trajectory of Ethiopia’s current agricultural reform agenda? Are the recent state-led initiatives showing signs of structural change? Lawrence Freeman: Yes, I would say that the progress being made by Ethiopia in agriculture is very significant. The government thinks they have already reached self-sufficiency on wheat in 2022/23, and they’re projecting they may be able to produce 30 million tons of wheat in 2025. Several things have taken place that have made it effective. One is they’re increasing the use of irrigation, which is necessary for modern farming. This has increased the number of hectares where they can grow crops. Second, Ethiopian farming was based on subsistence farming of one to two hectares, but now the concept is cluster farming, where groups of farmers come together, prepare the land, plant, plow, and use advanced machinery collectively. This collective strength has led to a huge increase in productivity and income per hectare, according to the agricultural department. These are some of the things Ethiopia is doing, and pretty much Ethiopia should no longer be importing any food from this point on. This is very important because Africa, for no good reason, was importing tens of billions of dollars of food across the continent, even though the land was perfectly capable and was self-sufficient in the 60s and 70s. Due to neoliberal economic policies, development stopped. Ethiopia is playing a very good role in promoting this kind of development. This has been one of the driving points of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. They have reduced levies on buying tractors and equipment and reduced taxes. The whole orientation of promoting agriculture is substantial and hopefully will continue.

Horn Review: How do you view the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam as a strategic asset for agricultural transformation in Ethiopia? Do you see it meaningfully supporting irrigation and mechanization in the short or long term?

The magnifiant Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, almost completedMay 2025

Lawrence Freeman: Since May 2025, almost everything has been completed; all 13 turbines and waterways have been constructed that bring water down to the turbines. They are now in the testing phase, with about six turbines operating and testing the remaining seven. The target for completion and inauguration is likely to be in September or earlier.

This is a huge plus for Ethiopia. The dam holds 74 billion cubic meters of water, which will essentially push water out to irrigate the entire area, as Ethiopia has numerous river systems. Although the water flow from the dam is not to be used for agriculture, but for hydroelectric power, the increase in water presence and moisture in the area will affect agriculture. Of course, there will be more electricity. The dam’s capability right now is about 2,600 megawatts, but it was reaching about 1,800 megawatts when I visited the GERD. Once you begin to utilize more of the 5,150 megawatts available, you start electrifying rural areas. When poor farmers in rural districts begin to have electricity, that changes everything. As you get more electricity to rural areas, you transform productivity, farming, and make every farmer and worker more productive.

Horn Review: Do you think the West recognizes the significance of Ethiopia building the largest hydroelectric dam on the continent? Lawrence Freeman: No, I don’t think there has been enough recognition by the West, certainly not by the United States or Europe. Ethiopia is building the largest hydroelectric dam on the continent and the 17th largest in the world. This is a real plus, which unfortunately the West ignores or doesn’t want to recognize at this point. Horn Review: What would you say is the effect of increasing energy production on Ethiopia’s food security and economy?

Lawrence Freeman: Electricity is the most important single ingredient to a successful economy. Infrastructure is essential. You need infrastructure that includes electricity, rail transportation, road transportation, and water management. All this creates the platform on which the entire physical economy rests. The denser and more advanced your infrastructure platform is, the more it raises productivity at all levels of the economy. For example, across Africa, 30 to 40% of food rots before it reaches the market; in Ethiopia, it’s about 30%. To correct that, you need infrastructure that gets food to market quickly, such as modern fast rail transportation and refrigerated cars to keep food from spoiling. This all requires electricity and roads. There’s no way to become an industrialized economy and lift all people out of poverty without infrastructure, and electricity is the key to infrastructure. With the completion of the dam and the addition of 5,150 megawatts, Ethiopia will become the second-largest electricity producer in sub-Saharan Africa, only behind South Africa, which has a nuclear power plant. That is significant, but not enough for 130 million people. Every part of society must be connected to electricity to achieve real independent sovereignty of development and reach its potential.

Lawrence Freeman looking at the GERD reservoir that holds 74 billion cubic meters of water

Horn Review: How might the electricity generated by the dam reshape rural economies and agribusiness within Ethiopia and the wider Horn of Africa region?

Lawrence Freeman: Ethiopia has already begun regional economic integration because electricity is now being exported to Djibouti, North Sudan, and Kenya. Before the end of the year, there will be transmission to Tanzania. Electricity from the dam is transported to Ethiopia’s grid and then through power lines to neighboring countries. Djibouti and Kenya want to increase imports of electicity. Ethiopia is already practicing regional integration with the African Free Trade Area. Ethiopia’s agricultural model, successful over five years, is something other countries should emulate. Development is the key to peace, security, raising living standards, and creativity. I have been coming here for 11 years and have seen impressive progress.

Horn Review: How do you assess the regional implications of Ethiopia’s agricultural and energy policies for neighboring countries such as Kenya, Sudan, Somalia, and Djibouti, especially in the context of transboundary water and food systems?

Lawrence Freeman: Water is a big issue in Africa. People think there’s always a danger of water wars, but there is a lot of water in Africa; the problem is it’s not always in the right place. We have to build appropriate canals and waterways to take water from where it is to where it’s needed. I saw this on some farms, where people are building waterways to bring water to crop areas. The Nile is the longest river in the world, but not the most voluminous. Ten countries in the Nile basin all use Nile water, which will not last forever. My view is we must move toward rapid nuclear-powered desalination to take salt out of Mediterranean seawater and build the equivalent of a second Nile. The idea of competition over the Nile is not the right way to look at it; it’s about development. Egyptians have adopted a British imperialist policy because Queen Victoria gave it to them in 1903; it’s their river. This is artificial. The first agreement was in 1929 between the British Sudan and Egypt, both under British control, which is British imperialism. The second agreement in 1959 was between Egypt and Sudan, no longer under British control, but with the same division of water. Ethiopia wasn’t at either conference. The water from the Blue Nile is not part of any agreement, but the colonial view is that they must have guarantees on the water from the Blue Nile. The dam has three mechanisms to maintain a continuous flow of water downstream, so downstream countries get a more regulated and concentrated flow from the reservoir.

Five of the thirteen waterways of the GERD that direct water from the reservoir to drive the turbines

Sudan is intimidated by Egypt, but it should align with Ethiopia they benefit from it. Egypt should give up this colonialist mentality. They never saw the Blue Nile basin as a development but as a water tank to be used in droughts to help Egyptian farmers. There is huge potential in the Blue Nile basin; three additional hydroelectric plants can be built. None would be as large as the GERD, but would add electricity. We are at the beginning of the process. The idea is to think in terms of development and countries working together for the development of the nations of the Nile. It’s a fate accompli; nothing can stop the dam, but a more enlightened mentality is needed.

This also relates to port access to the Red Sea, another important waterway. The 1993 agreement, after Eritrea separated, left the port of Assab, a natural port for Ethiopia, in southern Eritrea, but it’s not used. Eritreans can’t see the benefit of working with Ethiopia. Ethiopia’s economy is the biggest and fastest-growing in East Africa. Developing that port would bring revenue, commerce, trade, and millions of tons of freight. But antagonisms and shortsightedness prevent progress.

From a physical economist’s standpoint, a good leader must think 20 to 40 years ahead for future generations. It’s natural that an agreement on Assab would be worked out to fight poverty and hunger in the region. People don’t think this way. Hopefully, there will be a peaceful resolution for additional port access because Djibouti charges a lot for access. These are issues to be dealt with by thoughtful leaders for the benefit of their people to raise living standards. Once material standards rise and people live dignified lives, they can focus on developing creative minds. But you can’t get there without material existence.

Horn Review: In light of this, do you see viable frameworks for cooperation around the dam that could support regional food security and climate resilience, or are geopolitical tensions likely to overshadow such efforts?

Horn of Africa, which has huge potential for development (courtesy of hiiraan.com)

Lawrence Freeman: Much of what happens here is shaped by history. Ethiopia is the only country not conquered. I recently saw the museum that Prime Minister Abiy built, celebrating Adwa. My suggestion is that whatever day they inaugurate the dam, they add it as a national holiday, GERD Day, because it can unify the country. Unfortunately, there is a history involving British colonialism, Somalia, Italian colonialism, and Eritrea, which in various ways were manipulated. Somalia, and Somaliland were independent for about five or six days before forming the nation. Somaliland has been functioning almost independently for 30 years or more. This colonial legacy and antagonism prevent regional economic development.

Ethiopia, like all African countries, uses a tiny fraction of its arable land. There is potential for land and actual use of arable land, and an even tinier fraction is irrigated. Ethiopia has just started irrigation, which is excellent. This concept can be used in all African countries. One of my missions is to end poverty and hunger in Africa. Many still live in poverty with very low income per capita. This must change. You can’t do that unless you produce more wealth and put more people to work. The transformation plan and home-grown economic reform of the Prime Minister emphasize manufacturing.

Africa has been prevented from producing real manufacturing industries. Less than 3% of total manufactured goods in the world come from Africa. Ethiopia is working on light industry, leather, and adding value to agricultural products like coffee, the biggest export. Building up manufacturing, next to infrastructure, is an essential part of an economy.

The fundamental issue is that the constitution has to be changed. Everyone knows that, but you need a robust, maybe contentious, discussion, debate, and dialogue with the people of Ethiopia. You have to attack the notion of national ethnic identity, not ethnic culture, but ethnic identity. What must be reinforced is that Ethiopia is a nation-state and its people are citizens of a nation-state, not members of a national ethnicity. Ethnic nationalism is the enemy and is deeply ingrained. There is no congruence between ethnic nationalism and citizenship. People should not give up their rich history, but must see themselves as members of a nation.

Lawrence Freeman, studying the victorious Battle of Adwa that helped shape the identity of Ethiopia

Horn Review: That’s a profound idea. How should international partners engage with Ethiopia’s dual push for food self-sufficiency and energy leadership, given the sensitivity surrounding the dam and regional politics?

Lawrence Freeman: The international community doesn’t understand economic development or Ethiopia. There are many NGOs and international organizations, some being dismantled by the US, but they don’t focus on questions that would change society. If you want to improve life, bring democracy, and good governance, you must put electricity at the top of the list. Without electricity, people don’t develop. Good governance over poverty is meaningless. The West must change its thinking. Look at why Western leaders haven’t complimented Ethiopia on the GERD, the largest hydroelectric dam built without money from World Bank or IMF. Why haven’t presidents visited the GERD? The West is ideologically deficient and prejudiced against development, so they’re not good partners now. This will change because China is outproducing the US in many economic sectors, and the US is contracting its manufacturing base.

The West’s ideology is collapsing, and China and BRICS are growing. Ethiopia is one of three African countries in BRICS. The Global South is forming new political and economic relations based on a new paradigm of development and growth. Hopefully, enlightened leaders in Africa, Latin America, and others will recognize that the world is no longer fixed in a hierarchy. The West must change and recognize that Africa needs long-term, low-interest credit for infrastructure to build hydroelectric and nuclear power plants. Infrastructure itself may not make money, but it raises the economy’s profitability. We should unite with China to help African nations build infrastructure to eliminate poverty and hunger. The West should work with Africa in critical transformational areas.

Garment factory in Ethiopia. Many tens of thousands of Ethiopians employed in the garment industry

Horn Review: From a regional integration perspective, what role could Ethiopia’s emerging industrial base, especially agro-processing and light manufacturing, play in reshaping trade and economic interdependence in Africa?

Lawrence Freeman: Ethiopia’s major export is coffee, which can have added value. Ethiopia is self-sufficient in wheat and can start exporting wheat for foreign exchange. Africa wastes foreign exchange on buying agricultural products and importing food. Ethiopia is close to eliminating this system. Ethiopia has 165 million livestock, the largest in Africa, which supports the leather industry. Ethiopia plans to build steel plants. Ethiopia needs national industries like steel, aluminum, and cement to avoid buying from other countries on their terms.

The West controls the terms of trade. Producing your own goods increases revenue. Tourism is important, but service and tourism make up 40% of GDP, which is not ideal because service and tourism bring revenue but not wealth. Manufacturing, agriculture, and mining should be emphasized. Gold is a big revenue source now. Ethiopia should focus on industry. Ethiopia’s leaders understand this. I’ve worked with many African countries that don’t grasp this economic concept. Ethiopia understands this. There are problems, but progress exists. Maybe it’s not fast enough or comprehensive, but it’s a basis for optimism.

Use of mechanized agriculture improves productivity for Ethiopia’s farmers

Horn Review: Ethiopia is also investing heavily in urban infrastructure and industrial parks. How do you assess the role of urban development in facilitating structural transformation, labor mobility, and regional economic competitiveness?

Lawrence Freeman: I toured Addis Ababa with the mayor’s office and have watched the city change since 2014. It’s almost unrecognizable. Policies include clearing polluted rivers, new walkways, and tree planting. Trees are the best way to improve the environment. Trees are important because they absorb CO2 and produce oxygen. Photosynthesis changes climate through transpiration how much water comes up and down. To change deserts; plant trees. Ethiopia has planted 40 billion seedlings, with 10 billion more to go, which is very positive. People displaced from less developed areas along waterways have not been thrown out but resettled with housing, food, and small manufacturing plots like bakeries. This is positive.

The changes in Addis Ababa, farming, and manufacturing are slow but in the right direction. Ethiopia has 130 million people to employ, which is hard, but this is the direction. There are detractors of Prime Minister Abiy, but I follow his policies carefully. I don’t analyze every political nuance but look at substantial results, which are palatable. This should be encouraged and supported. Criticisms are fine if made in good faith to move the country forward. If you want to criticize, propose better policies. Otherwise, keep quiet and let economic development proceed.

Horn Review: Professor Freeman, we’ve had a very insightful discussion. You have enlightened us, and thank you once again for coming on our podcast. Lawrence Freeman: My pleasure. Happy to do it. (all emphasis added)

Read thye current issue of Horn Review below. My interview begins on page 8.

­͏Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.comalso publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the Worldand on X @lkfreemansafrica 

Ethiopia’s Majestic GERD Is Not Appreciated By The U.S. & West

July 21, 2024

On July 14, I participated in an hour long podcast called, The Winers (click on the video above). It was a friendly and informative discussion that centered around Ethiopia’s Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam-GERD, and its policy for development. After the podcast began with a three minute video of the GERD, we had a lively discussion that included the following topics.

  • What was wrong with USAID, and will President Trump’s African policy be better for Africa
  • President trump’s “lunch summit” with five African nations
  • United States’ historic role surveying the GERD from 1957 to 1964
  • Egypt’s geopolitical opposition to the GERD
  • President John Kennedy, the last US leader who understood Africa
  • Ethiopia’s commitment to expanding its manufacturing sector
  • Erroneous claim of China’s debt-trap policy
  • Progress by Ethiopia in agriculture especially production of wheat
  • The Global South’s opposition to Israel’s genocide in Gaza

Lawrence Freeman, May 2025, standing in front of several of the GERD’s water ways that deliver water to turn the turbines.

Read below my earlier posts on the GERD:

Trump Exposes His Ignorance of Grand Ethiopia Renaissance Dam

Completed Ethiopia Dam-GERD Can Power East African Nations

­͏Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.comalso publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the Worldand on X @lkfreemansafrica  

Energy Poverty Is Killing Africans & Preventing Industrialization

Picture of the Earth from space at night depicting electricity distribution around the globe. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

July 2, 2025

I am posting below, the latest article by Gyude Moore, because I concur with his insightful analysis. He articulates well, the failure of energy policy for Africa, which must be changed for the survival of African nations.

Electricity is the life blood of an economy; when that lifeblood does not exist, the economy fails to be healthy and livable, and human beings die.

Let me be as blunt as possible.

All the NGOs, human rights organizations, good governance activists, charitable foundations, Western nations and their financial institutions, so called environmentalists, and even the United Nations itself, either out of ignorance or malice, refuse to advocate for the quality and quantity of energy required to end poverty, hunger, and unnecessary deaths in Africa. Solar energy, the latest craze, can light a light bulb or charge a phone, but it is too diffuse an energy source to power an industrial economy. As Moore correctly emphasizes, African nations need abundant powerful forms of energy to industrialize their economies and build their manufacturing sectors.

It is the height of arrogance and moral hypocrisy, for people whose lives and nations exist due to the exploitation of carbon based fossil fuels, to deny that right of exploitation to others. Every aspect of modern Western life depends on manufacturing and electricity. A robust program of utilizing all forms of energy, including small nuclear reactors, should begin immediately to secure Africa’s industrialization. It is the lack of economic development that drives instability and insecurity in African nations.

Key excerpts from Moore’s article:  

“But for all its strengths, the report is silent on one of the most critical aspects of Africa’s energy future: the productive use of electricity—particularly for industrialization. This omission is more than an oversight. It matters. It reflects a broad pattern about how development practitioners think about energy in Africa: too often as a social good to be distributed, instead of a strategic input for economic transformation.

“If Africa is to industrialize, we need a new energy narrative—one that links energy to human development. One that counts kilowatt-hours for steel mills and assembly lines, not just solar lanterns. One that sees energy as the foundation of wealth, not merely well-being.

Image credit – SDG 7 report

Access Without Power: The SDG7 Report’s Silent Gap on Africa’s Productive Future

by W. Gyude Moore from the Africa Project <gyudemoore@substack.com>

Every year, the Tracking SDG7: Energy Progress Report provides a necessary but sobering update on how far the world is from achieving universal energy access. The 2024 edition is no different. It confirms what many of us working in African development already know: that energy poverty in Africa remains an existential problem and the region of the continent south of the Sahara remains the epicenter of global energy poverty.

The report draws much needed attention to the stagnation in global electrification, the widening urban-rural divide, and the increasingly indispensable role of decentralized renewables. The analysis rightly highlights that solar home systems and mini-grids must do the heavy lifting if we are to reach the most remote and vulnerable communities. In doing so, the report provides a valuable, evidence-based foundation for governments, investors, and donors to coordinate their efforts.

But for all its strengths, the report is silent on one of the most critical aspects of Africa’s energy future: the productive use of electricity—particularly for industrialization. This omission is more than an oversight. It matters. It reflects a broad pattern about how development practitioners think about energy in Africa: too often as a social good to be distributed, instead of a strategic input for economic transformation.

Energy as Survival, Not Development

The report measures progress by counting connections and households with basic access. That is essential—access to light, refrigeration, and clean cooking saves lives and lifts burdens, especially for women and girls.

But energy is more than light. It is an indispensable precondition of industrialization. You cannot process cocoa without reliable electricity. You cannot operate a textile mill on a solar lantern. You cannot build the factories, agro-processors, or logistics cold chains that Africa needs if the electricity system is engineered only to power bulbs, not businesses.

What Kind of Access Are We Measuring?

The SDG7 report congratulates progress in off-grid solutions—but it doesn’t ask whether those solutions can support productive livelihoods. There is no mention of voltage stability, grid reliability, or the cost per kilowatt-hour for small and medium enterprises. In most African countries, industrial users face:

· High prices per unit cost

· Frequent outages or load shedding

· Absence of power in designated economic zones

If we are serious about structural transformation, then not all connections are equal. Counting connections without considering quality risks creating a hollow narrative of progress. And this is one of my worries about Mission 300 – that given the self-imposed limits of reaching its goal in 4.5 years, the measure of success will focus on counting connections.

Courtesy of Ken Opalo

Sub-Saharan Africa manufacturing output for 2023 was 234.69 billion US dollars, a 3.05% decline from 2022.

Industrialization Needs Its Own Energy Track

Africa’s population is young, urbanizing, and growing. Every year, millions more enter the labor market. Where will the jobs come from?

We know the answer: manufacturing, processing, value addition. And we know what those activities require: abundant, reliable, and affordable power. Yet the report offers no analysis on industrial energy use, no insight into how to extend abundant power to rural agro-processing clusters, no discussion of the energy implications of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). That’s not just a gap. It’s a blind spot. And this blind spot is reflected in the kinds of solutions offered for the continent’s energy poverty problem.

To be clear, household access must remain a priority. But Africa’s energy strategy must also be judged by its ability to empower—not just individuals, but entire economies. That means:

· Powering industrial parks in the Gambia, Sierra Leone as well as Cote d’Ivoire

· Supporting cold storage and irrigation in Senegal and Malawi

· Energizing green manufacturing zones in Nigeria and South Africa

I would thus recommend a second track in the SDG7 framework—one that focuses not on access alone, but on abundance.

Reframing Energy for Africa’s Future

As noted in the beginning of this blog, the report is a necessary account of what progress is being made on this goal. However, having seen as many “plans for Africa” as any one person should see over a lifetime, I worry that this line of thinking ends up mistaking motion for momentum. The SDG7 report shows us where we are, but I find its proposed solution of where we need to go, incomplete. It tells us how to keep the lights on. It doesn’t tell us how to power prosperity.

If Africa is to industrialize, we need a new energy narrative—one that links energy to human development. One that counts kilowatt-hours for steel mills and assembly lines, not just solar lanterns. One that sees energy as the foundation of wealth, not merely well-being.

The world’s energy agenda for Africa must not be satisfied with lighting our homes while leaving economies in the dark. Read: energy poverty in Africa remains an existential problem 

Read below my earlier posts on this topic.

Energy poverty sustains poverty because electricity is the foundation of all economic development  ­͏     ­͏   Energy Poverty Is Killing Africans-Renewables Are Insufficient 

­͏  Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.comalso publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the Worldand on X @lkfreemansafrica   ­͏  

  ͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏

Why Nuclear Power and Why Now For Africa?

Africa’s only nuclear powerplant in Koeberg South Africa. (Courtesy cbn.co.za)

March 30, 2025

Below is an important article on nuclear power for Africa by a colleague of mine .

Published in Nuclear Network Africa, South Africa, March 25.

Yes, Nuclear for Small Countries in Africa!

By David Cherry

Africa is now on a path toward industrialization. There can be no sovereignty without the national power that comes from industrialization, and that’s where nuclear power comes in. It is no accident that the first five BRICS nations all have nuclear power plants—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. It is no accident that the other five full BRICS members either have nuclear power (Iran, UAE), or are building their first plant (Egypt), or have concrete plans for nuclear power (Ethiopia, Indonesia).

Only yesterday it was unthinkable that nuclear power could be available to most African nations. But today, nuclear power is no longer the privilege of the industrialized countries. Technological apartheid has been largely defeated.

The up-front expense of a nuclear power plant is still a consideration, however. Doesn’t this expense restrict nuclear to African nations with relatively large budgets? On the continent today, only South Africa has a functioning nuclear power plant. Egypt’s large plant—comprising four reactors, each producing 1200 megawatts of electricity (1200 MWe)—is now under construction.

And the other countries? Small modular reactors (SMRs) and microreactors give most small African countries the nuclear option. Because these reactors are small and their major components can be produced on an assembly line, their price is within reach of most countries. With these small reactors, the revenue from the first installed reactor can help pay the cost of adding more units on the same site.

There are about 80 SMRs designed or being designed worldwide. Russia and China have SMRs in operation. South Africa’s HTMR-100 is fully designed and ready to be built.

A reactor that produces 20 to 300 MWe is called a small modular reactor (SMR) and one under 20 MWe is a microreactor. Nuclear reactors produce a significant amount of heat that can also be used, but SMRs and microreactors are defined in terms of their electric output. In Japan, Toshiba has its 4S model that will produce 10 MWe, while in the U.S. the TVA model is designed for 15 MWe. There are even smaller ones. The South African HTMR-100 will put out 35 MWe. Other sizes include Russia’s RITM-200 at 55 Mwe, now operating; and in China, two SMRs are now operating: the ACP100 producing 125 MWe, and the HTR-PM, 210 MWe.

Different designs are suitable for different conditions. Some use water to keep the reactor sufficiently cool and must therefore be near a large water body. Designs that use circulating helium for cooling can be placed inland.

But the cost of the reactor itself is not the only problem. No power plant can function if the electricity network lacks the capacity to deliver the electricity to users. Another problem is having enough trained technicians for plant operation. For both problems, the SMR provides relief. The first SMR will not need a large staff, and it can grow as more reactors are added. As for transmission capacity, the first SMR may not require much upgrade of the network.

Why Nuclear and Why Now?

For now, many African governments will expand their use of coal and hydro-power and possibly add natural gas, because even small reactors are not mail-order items that will arrive next week. But now is the time to start along the path to nuclear because of its longer lead time. These other sources will still be important in the energy mix long after nuclear is first up and running.

But why, then, is nuclear necessary? Nuclear is the energy source of the future because uranium and thorium are vastly more energy dense than any conventional source, especially solar and wind. For example, a kilogram of uranium-235 contains two or three million times the energy of a kilogram of coal or oil. (Imagine avoiding the cost of the constant flow of coal-laden trucks from mine to power plant. Nuclear fuel lasting years may weigh only a few kilograms.) Not only that. A nuclear power plant does not have a large footprint compared to any other power plant of equivalent output. These two factors together are the “energy-flux density” of the given combination of fuel and technology. Higher energy-flux density indicates greater efficiency and lower cost per megawatt.

Africa is now on a path toward industrialization. There can be no sovereignty without the national power that comes from industrialization, and that’s where nuclear power comes in. It is no accident that the first five BRICS nations all have nuclear power plants—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. It is no accident that the other five full BRICS members either have nuclear power (Iran, UAE), or are building their first plant (Egypt), or have concrete plans for nuclear power (Ethiopia, Indonesia).

David Cherry is an editorial staff member of the Executive Intelligence Review in Washington, D.C., and was formerly of 21st Century Science & Technology magazine and the International Journal of Fusion Energy.

Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.com, and also publishing on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the World

America’s Self-Interest is to Generously Assist in Development of Africa

This interview was conducted on November 7, 2024, by Anton Chaitkin, antonchaitkin@substack.com author of Who-We-Are

November 12, 2024

The African continent with its projected population of 2.4 billion in the next twenty-five years, will be the center of commerce on the planet. It is in America’s interest to help African nations achieve substantially higher rates of economic growth.

The root cause of virtually all the conflicts ongoing in Africa are the result of  underdevelopment, despite having different circumstances and triggers. The continued expansion of poverty on the African continent, especially among the sub-Saharan nations, is the primary cause of unrest. Desperate, hungry, impoverished people fighting for scraps to merely survive leads to instability and conflict. The U.S., since the death of John Kennedy, has failed to join African nations in advancing their economies by investing massively in infrastructure. If the trillions of dollars spent on USAID and countered terrorism, was turned into long term-low interest loans or outright grants for infrastructure African nations would be more peaceful and prosperous.

The African continent is the least industrialized and has the largest deficit in density of infrastructure per land area and per capita. Africa today produces 1.9 percent of the world’s manufactured goods. This pitiful amount of manufacturing activity contributes to its unmatched levels of poverty. Africa’s vast uncultivated land can feed Africa and other parts of the world, if sufficient expansion in electricity, railroads, roads, and irrigation were undertaken.

China has already proven that poverty can be eliminated. If the U.S. radically altered its foreign-economic policy towards Africa and collaborated with China, it is possible to eradicate poverty and hunger on the African continent within one generation.

Read below my earlier posts:

U.S. Elections Approach: America is Better Than This Spectacle

Hard Infrastructure in Africa: Essential for Economic Growth. Development is a Human Right!

China Eliminated Poverty With Science and Infrastructure. It Can Be Done in Africa Too!

Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, and consultant on Africa. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog:   lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.com, and also publishing on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the World.”

African Leaders Speak Out for Physical Economic Growth at World Bank Forum

Watch Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni’s at the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) summit, April 29 in Nairobi, Kenya

May 22, 2024

African leaders are displaying signs of resistance to simply taking orders from the Western controlled international financial system and their so called rules-based order. Their opposition to the diktats from the  political-financial oligarchy has been demonstrated on two crucial fronts: energy and manufacturing.

Increasingly, African leaders are resisting demands from “developed” nations, whose populations have already 100% access to electricity, that less developed nations can only use so called renewables. The “advanced sector” threatens nations whose populations are literally dying from the lack of electricity, that they will not receive funds for investment in fossil fuel production. In other words, they insist African nations endowed with vast hydrocarbon natural resources should be prevented from utilizing these resources to produce electricity, which is necessary to improve the lives of their people. Under the cover of their duplicitous concern for the environment, the West is willing to have millions of Africans die with their deceitful cries to “save the planet.“ The two-faced nature of the rules-based order and their financial intuitions is demonstrated by their lack of support for major hydro-power projects in Africa. The United States and Europe have not supported the Grand Renaissance Dam (Ethiopia-5,150 MW), the Grand Inga (Democratic Republic of the Congo-40-50,000 MW), of the multination water project, Transaqua.

South African Mineral Resources and Energy Minister, Gwede Mantashe

Read the courageous analysis by South African Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy, Gwede Mantashe: South Africa Energy Minister Rejects Western Dictates & Hypocrisy Against Africa’s Use of Energy Resources

Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni, Tanzanian President, and Samia Suluhu Hassan, speaking at the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) summit (April 29th, Nairobi, Kenya) spoke for the necessity to fund manufacturing and infrastructure in Africa. (See below) It is imperative to end the Wests’ singular focus on extractive industries to loot Africa’s valuable resources. Numerous African leaders are correctly demanding that none of their critical minerals should leave their nations in its raw form. Instead, they insist these minerals must be transformed into products for trade and consumption by a growing indigenous manufacturing sector.

Read the remarks by Naledi Pandor, South African Minister of International relations,  at the Ministerial meeting of the Bi-National Commission of South Africa and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, last year. South African Minister Pandor Articulates Principles of Development for Africa

South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Grace Naledi Pandor

Edited excerpts below from the address by Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni, to the International Development Association (IDA) summit April 29 in Nairobi, Kenya.

Borrowing for what? capacity building. Imagine! Seminars, they call you in a hotel, you eat chapati, mandazi, they say that is capacity building…it should be on the ground not just in seminars. So, if you are serious, I need to hear about the low cost funding for manufacturing, not for stories…for manufacturing,” he remarked.

The crisis Africa is in today is because of philosophical, ideological, strategic economic mistakes, which we have been talking about since the 1960s.

Our populations are increasing, but our economies are stunted. The IDA should tell us why they are funding the modern slavery of Africans, and we should address issues like why Africa is producing what it does not consume and consuming what it does not produce. ,The crisis Africa is in today is because of philosophical, ideological, strategic economic mistakes, which we have been talking about since the 1960s.

I was very happy the president of the World Bank talking about prosperity instead of profiteering, his own words. The problem has been the World Bank people and other groups talking of sustainable development. I have seen that those words sustainable development.

I’m not going to be 80 years old I’ve never seen sustainable pregnancy that the woman is pregnant this year the pregnancy continues the next year three years four years. It never happens in life pregnancy develops sustainably. The baby is growing bigger and bigger but at some stage one static growth must be transformed into qualitative change, the pregnancy must become a baby. I would even ask you to change those words in your documents. Africa does not need sustainable; you could call the sustainable under development. Africa needed this social economic transformation. The pregnancy must become a baby, the baby must grow and grow, and become a teenager. The teenager must grow. That is what happens in life. You cannot have quantitative growth and think you are doing anything.

So, if you are serious, I need to hear about the low- cost funding for manufacturing, not for stories … for manufacturing. The main reason why there is no growth is because the growth factors are not funded, they are not even under understood; those who want to help Africa should fund our transport systems, electricity, raw material processing, and import substitution.

Our populations are increasing, but our economies are stunted. The IDA should tell us why they are funding the modern slavery of Africans, and we should address issues like why Africa is producing what it does not consume and consuming what it does not produce.

I banned the export of minerals from Uganda. No export of minerals from Uganda if it is not processed here. You wait until I go away you can steal the minerals but not now. I ban this export of unprocessed minerals. Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni

Tanzania President Samia Suluhu Hassan in Muscat, Oman on June 14, 2022. (courtesy of theeastafrican.co.ke)

Museveni was seconded by Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan,  who has fought for infrastructure development in her own nation. She said:

Considering the challenges related to present projected debt levels, we strongly believe that IDA should focus more on providing concessional loans such as 50-year credit loans. These facilities will provide more fiscal space for African countries to address competing development needs. (Emphasis added)

She is correct in identifying the need for long-term ,low interest loans to maximize investment in infrastructure and manufacturing. Infrastructure Progress in Tanzania

Watch Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni’s 30 minute speech at the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) summit, April 29 in Nairobi, Kenya

Courtesy of PD Lawton: africanagenda.net/musevenis-aptly-describes-sustainable-development-and-says-fund-the-railways-instead

Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, and consultant on Africa. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog:  lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.com, and also publishing on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the World.”