The United States and China Became Industrial Powers Thru Infrastructure: Railroads

Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln, 1861-1865. The greatest of all American Presidents

October 18, 2026

As you will read in the excerpted article below, President Abraham Lincoln and his network, which most importantly included economist Henry Carey, extended railroad development in the United States, which was responsible for its massive industrial growth. Most Americans, including our so called leaders, are downright ignorant of the actual history America. They have no truthful understanding of how the United States became an industrial power, before its self-imposed collapse beginning in the 1970s. If one were to examine the intensity of infrastructure projects in the United States that were initiated at the beginning of the 1800s, one would realize it was U.S. government directed infrastructure that formed our industrial national economy. This was in opposition to Adam Smith’s so-called free trade, free market, and supply and demand theories.

Immediately after the successful American Revolution, numerous large-scale infrastructure projects were launched including the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, the National Road, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, and the Erie Canal. These projects aided by the federal government were an implementation of Alexander Hamilton’s fundamental scientific principles, which later became known as the American System of political Economy. President Lincoln, a follower of Alexander Hamilton, who was advised by Hamiltonian Henry Carey, continue this course of development in the second half of the nineteenth century. As you can see from the article and graphs below, it was President Lincoln’s  policies of dirigisme* that created America as an industrial power leading into the twentieth century.

China followed similar economic principles, which have completely transformed its economy during the brief period of the last two generations. This economic “miracle” was driven by the same dirigistic ideas of the American System. To wit: massive railroad construction, production of plentiful electricity, and building a robust manufacturing sector, including a steel industry. This concept was already known from its first President of the Republic of China, Dr. Sun Yat-sen, in his plan to industrialize the nation. Similar to President Lincoln’s railroad expansion, Dr. Sun Yat-sen, a follower of the American System, proposed that China’s industrialization would be driven by the construction of a density of railroad lines across China. (see graphic below)

*Dirigisme: an economic system where the state takes an active and directive role in guiding and shaping the economy towards national development goals, unlike laissez-faire economics..

The railway map of Sun Yat-sen appears in The International Development of China, originally published in English in 1920. It forms part of his “Industrial Plan” for national modernization in early Republican China. Courtesy of reddit.com

This is an edited transcript of the presentation that Richard Freeman gave to a July 5, 2026, at a Sare for President event in the Philadelphia area. Published in the October 16, 2026 issue of EIR magazine

Lincoln’s Economic Miracle, or the President Who Taught Shakespeare, Burns, and Poe to America

Excerpts follow.

By Richard Freeman

Abraham Lincoln, a student of Henry Carey and supporter of Henry Clay, both advocates of the American System, took over the American Presidency in March of 1861 in perhaps the harshest conditions any person before or since ever has.

Yet, he accomplished not only the defeat of the British-centered, -financed, and ‑directed Confederate slaveholders’ insurrection; preserved and expanded the Union; and began the decisive eradication of the barbaric Nazi-like institution of Black chattel slavery with his January 1, 1863, Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, but he also led an economic miracle.

Most Americans do not know that miracle exists or what it was. I hope you will get an idea of it by my selection of a few critical features to illustrate it. This presentation will emphasize that this miracle occurred, as all growth has occurred throughout history, as an economic shock wave, as described by Lyndon LaRouche.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Credit: Public Domain

This is a schlieren photograph of an airplane model with swept wings, at Mach 1.2 [Figure 1]. When an object, such as a jet plane, travels at a speed below the speed of sound, which is 760 miles per hour, there are certain physical laws that govern its behavior. When an object travels through the air faster than the speed of sound, the object outruns its own sound, and the pressure waves pile up into one massive, powerful, abrupt shock. From the ground, we hear this as a sonic boom. LaRouche says that the old laws no longer apply, that we enter a new domain. Think of this like a linked series of generated conical waves that pass over the back of the plane, with each conical wave representing an economic platform, having a higher set of scientific principles and power, and a higher power of reason, superseded by a new wave governed by even higher principles and power. This is what Lincoln’s economic miracle accomplished. I would add in support of Mr. LaRouche, that this series of successive breakthroughs was sustained, with interruptions, until the year 1900.

The American System

There are two features that accomplished this. One, the American System of Economics, which you have heard about this afternoon. In 1832, running as a candidate from Sangamon County for the Illinois House of Representatives, Lincoln stated:

My politics are short and sweet, like the old woman’s dance. I am in favor of a national bank. I am in favor of the internal improvement system, and a high protective tariff. These are my sentiments and political principles.

But as important as those principles are, this would not have worked without another quality of Lincoln: his poetical soul. Lincoln taught the writings and insights of William Shakespeare, Bobby Burns, and Edgar Poe to his Cabinet, to his generals, to the U.S. Congress, and to America.

Lincoln read, and could recite largely from memory, in particular, Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Hamlet, Richard III, King Lear, Henry VI, Henry VIII, Julius Caesar, and The Merchant of Venice. In the Spring of 1862, Lincoln visited the Union Army along the Potomac River. U.S. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton and Secretary of the Treasury Salmon Chase were present. Union General Egbert Viele, who was part of the party, reported about Lincoln, “With a mind well stored with the grandest and most beautiful in English literature, and a memory so wonderful that he could repeat, almost word for word, whatever he read, he would sit for hours during the trip repeating the finest passages of Shakespeare’s best plays.” Lincoln loved and recited Bobby Burns’s republican poem, “A Man’s a Man for A’ That,” in a Gaelic accent. On long rides, he recited by heart to his company Edgar Poe’s “The Raven.”

Why is this important? The plays allowed him to think deeply about leadership, what is tyranny, and, with Lady Macbeth, what is blind, unreasoning ambition and evil. As the poet Percy Shelley said, “Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world.” Lincoln had only twelve months of formal education; poetry was the only English language he knew. Lincoln lived in the realm of metaphor, the creative mind. He wrote poetically. He could perceive problems that his generals, like George McClellan, “Fighting Joe” Hooker, George Meade, and others couldn’t even see, and Lincoln solved them, directing the war.

Lincoln had a vision beyond that of his Cabinet and the Congress, and he led them to that vision. Poetry infused his soul and gave him his character. Frederick Douglass, the escaped slave and great American, who locked horns with Lincoln many times, including in his 1876 oration on Lincoln, said in an 1880 tribute to Lincoln, “A great man: Tender of heart, strong of nerve, of boundless patience and broadest sympathies, with no motive apart from his country. He could receive counsel from a child and give counsel to a sage. The simple approached him with ease…. Take him for all in all, Abraham Lincoln was one of the noblest, wisest, and best men I ever knew.”

The Greenback: A National Currency

With respect to the ordered shock waves, the U.S. Congress in 1862 passed a series of pieces of intermeshed legislation that, taken together as a unit, are among the most powerful ever passed. I call the 1862 Congress the Alexander Hamilton Congress.

First, look at Hamiltonian credit. In 1832, President Andrew Jackson treasonously dismantled the American System that had been erected by the previous President, John Quincy Adams. Four years before the Hamiltonian Second Bank of the United States was scheduled to be rechartered in 1836, Jackson destroyed the Bank by announcing he would refuse to recharter it and ordering the withdrawal of federal deposits from the Bank to leave it without any money to function. Jackson launched the era of wildcat banking: A person with almost no credit could set up a bank, provided he bought some state bonds and could convince a state banking representative to allow him to operate. The banks were state-chartered. By 1861, when Lincoln took office, there were 1,400 state-chartered wildcat banks; there were about 7,500 different currencies, each issued by a state bank. Many currencies were counterfeit or worthless.

Lincoln and the Republican Party, which controlled the Congress once the seceding Confederate states had walked out, proposed two large bond issues to fund the costly war. The first was called the 5-20 bond, a 20-year bond paying 6% interest, first issued in February 1862 but continued throughout the war, raising between 500 and 600 million dollars. Pro-American Philadelphia-based investment banker Jay Cooke had 2,500 sub-agents to sell the bonds directly to the American citizenry. This produced an amazing response by the American people. The government also issued three-year U.S. government bonds paying 7.3%, issued in the amount of $830 million. These, too, were sold by the Cooke system.

The U.S. government also used a progressive income tax, an excise tax, and tariffs to raise money.

As a result of the continued wildcat banking, the U.S. still did not have a sovereign currency. In February 1862, explicitly pro-Alexander Hamilton banker Elbridge Gerry Spaulding, a congressman from Buffalo, New York, introduced what became the Legal Tender Act. This introduced a U.S. currency that paid no interest and thus was a non-interest-bearing loan to the United States government. It was not convertible into gold. The first Act issued $150 million, and two subsequent legislative acts issued another $300 million for a total of $450 million in only 14 months. This currency was issued to soldiers and war materiel providers as pay, but then could circulate among merchants, businessmen and farmers. The $450 million in legal tender notes, called greenbacks because the backside of the note was green, tripled the U.S. currency supply in only 14 months, expanding productive economic activity greatly. Lyndon LaRouche strongly favored this, because the currency was issued and controlled by the United States government [as stipulated in the Constitution—ed.], not a private bank.  It restored sovereignty to the U.S. dollar.

There were other measures to force the closure of wildcat banks, in the 1864 and 1865 banking acts, which will be covered elsewhere.

The Transcontinental Railway

The second superlative measure from the 1862 Hamiltonian Congress was the Pacific Railway—to build the first transcontinental railway, which would connect the nation and set in motion several self-organized shock waves.

Lincoln was personally involved in the process. On August 13, 1859, he met the exceptional railroad engineer Grenville Dodge for two hours in Council Bluffs, Iowa, where, as Dodge said in his Recollections, Lincoln got all the best information from Dodge on the best route for a transcontinental railroad, which Dodge had already surveyed. Three years later, on July 1, 1862, Lincoln, as President, signed the Pacific Railway Act into law.

As the middle part of the map shows [Figure 2], there would be two railway companies: The first company, the Central Pacific, started in San Francisco–Sacramento, California, laying track and heading eastward; the second company, the Union Pacific, started in Council Bluffs, Iowa (near Omaha, Nebraska)—where Lincoln had met Dodge—laying track heading westward. The project started in 1863, and between 20,000 and 25,000 men worked on the arduous, and often engineering-challenging project. The track of the two railway companies met six years later at Promontory Point, Utah, on May 10, 1869, and the rail lines were joined, forming a 1,912-mile (3,077 km) rail line that was a marvel.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Credit: EIRNS

Consider a few of the explosive effects.

First, before the Pacific Railroad construction, a trip from Council Bluffs, Iowa, to Sacramento or San Francisco of a young man in good condition, with horses and supplies, took approximately 90 to 150 days, depending on the variables. The very first passenger train on the new transcontinental Pacific line took 4.25 days, a savings of time of 95 to 97%. Put another way, in terms of saving time, the railroad represented a growth in physical productivity of man’s transportation, of 3,500% at its uppermost level, which changes the space-time relationship between man and nature.

Second, counting the existing connecting railways from the East Coast to Council Bluffs, Iowa, the United States was now connected from coast to coast, realizing John Quincy Adams’s positive conception of continental expansion.

Third, now manufacturing and agricultural goods, including coal, metals, wheat, and corn, could cross the nation. In 1878, engineer Gustavus Swift and inventor Andrew Chase developed the first truly practical and widely used ice-cooled railcar. By the 1880s, the nation could transport fruits, vegetables, and cut-up meats in ice-cooled, insulated cars from California to Florida to Maine.

Fourth, as the map shows [Figure 2], there were five transcontinental railways, not one, covering the different latitudes of the United States, and there grew up connecting routes going north and south. The Northern Pacific, which is the northernmost one, and the Southern Pacific, which is the southernmost one, were both initiated by Lincoln. In total, he signed three of these [routes] into law.

Fifth, railroads are more than train routes; they form development corridors. Under railroad land grant acts, the U.S. government gave to the railroads strips of federal land extending outward 10 to 40 miles from both sides of the track, creating corridors up to 80 miles wide. The railroads, to gain operating capital and pay off their loans, sold this land to citizens, who bought it so that they could be near the railroad. The citizens built farms, communities, cities, schools, and new production facilities. The cities of Omaha, Nebraska; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Denver, Colorado; and Chicago, Illinois, all blossomed as a result of being in a railroad development corridor. This is city building, civilization building.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Credit: EIRNS / Source: American Railway Association

Sixth, look at [Figure 3]. The level of Class I railroad mileage in the United States rose from 30,000 miles in 1860 to 193,000 miles in 1900. That is a compounded annual growth rate of 13.4% for 40 years. If an economy grows by, say, 5 percent, for 7 or 8 years, that’s pretty good. Railroad track miles grew by a compounded 13.4% year after year for 40 straight years.

The U.S. government played the absolutely decisive dirigistic role in providing state-directed credit for the railroad building. While the private railroad companies raised funds, the U.S. government floated $64 million in bonds, a huge sum in those days, and then lent the bond money to the railroad companies to build the railways. They were thirty-year loans. The government also gave the railroads 130 million acres of U.S. land—that’s about 20,000 square miles—as a right of way for the railroad, and for the railroads to sell so that they could also have cash to pay their bills.

Figure 4.
Figure 4. Credit: EIRNS / Source: American Iron and Steel Institute

The railroads are the backbone of a shock-wave explosion, improving the productivity of every square mile of the United States, and of every citizen.

The railroads, as a science-driver, gave the impetus for the development of steel, and it was critical for building steel railroad tracks, steel bridges, and, by the 1890s, steel locomotives to handle far heavier loads and travel at higher speeds. Other elements of the U.S. economy also required greater volumes of steel. After U.S. engineer Alexander Lyman-Holley made critical technological improvements in the Bessemer steel process for the United States, steel production [Figure 4] grew by leaps and bounds, from 17 thousand tons produced in 1860, to 10 million tons in 1900 (and eventually to 141 million tons by 1969). In the last 40 years of the 19th Century, under the Lincoln economic miracle, the growth in steel-making capacity was 17.8% per year.

The steel spinoff helped produce another spinoff. Steel dramatically helped with the reaper and the harvester, which worked much better with steel than with using the more brittle iron. Comparing 1890, with the use of a steel reaper, to 1830, before there was a reaper, a single farmer could harvest seven times more bushels of wheat. Steel made farm implements more productive, farm implements made the economy more productive—an advance in one field led to an advance in another field. In 1860, the U.S. had 140,000 manufacturing factories, which tripled to 513,000 in 1900—which, by the way, is 100,000 more than we have today.       

When the original work of André-Marie Ampère and Wilhelm Weber on the development of the science of electricity and electromagnetism resulted in the development of commercially deliverable electricity in the 1880s by Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse, another wave of the shock front took over. Lincoln did not invent electricity, but he did have a lot to do with the building of the railroads, as a foundation, and creating the directed environment of one invention leading to the creation of another.

LaRouche noted that the Lincoln economic miracle was exported as a model to the Meiji Restoration in Japan, to Otto von Bismarck in Germany, and to Dmitri Mendeleyev in Russia.

One cannot complete discussion of Lincoln without noting that the Emancipation Proclamation he issued on January 1, 1863, was deliberately understated but had a shocking effect. It stated:

Therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States … by virtue of the power, and for the purpose aforesaid … do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.

This ending of slavery and the economic miracle–shock wave, LaRouche stated, made the United States the most powerful industrial economy on Earth, and restored its moral power in fulfilling the principles of the Declaration of Independence. Today, we need to deliberately create a self-developing economic shock wave, and to elicit the poetical soul of Abraham Lincoln.

Read below earlier articles on this topic:

China’s Xinhua Publishes Freeman: “Create a New Paradigm For economic Progress”

U.S. Pursues Alexander Hamilton To Achieve Economic Hegemony vs China: Can It Succeed?

China Is Committed to the ‘Hamiltonian’ Development of Africa: The U.S. Led West, Is Not

China’s Spokesperson Identifies Physical Economy: “It’s about making people’s lives better”

­͏Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.com, also publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the World, and on X @lkfreemansafrica 

Presidents Roosevelt and Xi Would Have Agreed on Developing the Global South

(Courtesy of X.com)

April 9, 2026

Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping were scheduled to have a summit in China, from March 31-April 2. President Trump requested a five to six week postponement due to his regime change quagmire in Iran. Their summit is now scheduled for May 13-15. However, this date depends on President Trump’s ability to extricate himself from his unilateral war and threats to extinguish Iranian civilization. Though there are many important subjects for these two leaders, representing the two largest economies in the world to discuss, the most critical issues literally borders on war or peace for the future of civilization. The world finds itself in its most dangerous crisis since World War II. However, with the global authority of the ruling Western political-financial elites weakening, new opportunities exist to create a superior paradigm where military conflict is replaced with vigorous commitments for economic development.

The challenge that presents itself, is that the two presidents espouse totally different world views, with two different thought processes. President Trump’s mental state is still infested by  the mindset of the rules-based order, that is: the most powerful hegemon should rule over all other nations. Recently, President Trump has adopted regime-change as his new foreign posture, previously rejecting this dangerous policy of the neo-conservative war party. Although President Trump claims to have a friendly and respectful relationship with President Xi, all branches of the United States government officially regard China as its primary enemy. This erroneous position is supported by the both the Republican and Democrat parties and the entire U.S. Congress.

Contrary to thousands of pages of Western propaganda maligning China, one can discern from President Xi’s global initiatives a superior approach to foreign policy than that of his American counterpart. Over the course of his leadership, President Xi has campaigned for the adoption of  “win-win” cooperation in opposition to the diseased“zero-sum” ideology of the U.S. Instead of searching for countries to overthrow or control in a “war of each against all as the natural state of civilization,” President Xi has presented a more elevated conception for the world, stressing the need to work for a more just and equitable global governance system and advance toward a community with a shared future for humanity.

Courtesy of realinstitutoelcano.org

Franklin Roosevelt Had A Vision

The U.S. today has no vision for civilization, except to dominate the world through sustaining superior military strength. However, that has not always been worldview of the United States. The foreign policy of President Franklin Roosevelt, the longest serving U.S. president, was guided by his intention to create a better world following the end of World War II. His Grand Design for the post war period featured an end to colonialism, in particular British Imperialism, support for sovereignty of all nations, and industrialization of the less developed nations. He knew that only through promoting economic development, expanded world trade, and the elimination of poverty could long term global peace be accomplished.

The creation of the Bretton Woods system, which President Roosevelt began preparing for prior to the entry of the U.S. into World War II, was integral to the intention of his Grand Design: to generate global economic growth. To this end he established the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), today known as the World Bank. As a student of Alexander Hamilton’s American System of economics, President Roosevelt understood that the need for a new credit issuing facility to supply development credits was essential to raise the standard of living of the world’s population. That was the purpose of the IBRD. U.S. Treasury representative, Harry Dexter White, a chief architects of Bretton Woods, wrote in a January 1942 draft, that a central purpose of “The Bank” was the provision of long term capital for desirable productive projects that served directly or indirectly to permanently raise the standard of living of the borrowing country.

One could accurately report that President Roosevelt’s Brenton Woods was in fact an extension of his Good Neighbor policy for the countries of Latin America. President Roosevelt advocated for an Inter-American Development Bank (IAB) for currency stabilization and long term loans to assist specific Latin American state sponsored development projects.

President Roosevelt’s intent for Bretton Woods to function as a credit bank, was criticized for its commitment for long-term international lending. In defense of these development credits, U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Mogenthau knew; If we help you to become prosperous, you will be able to buy more goods from us! Is this not the best means to advance the self-interest of each nation? Is this not “win-win” economic cooperation. Is this not exactly what China is practicing today through its Belt and Road Initiative?

Dr Sun Yat-Sen’s rail plan for China in 1919 specifically had in mind to integrate
Xinjiang, Mongolia, Tibet and Yunnan with rest of China.( courtesy of X.com)

Author Eric Helleiner (1) considers Sun Yat-sen, one of the early pioneers of state-led development. Sun’s book, the International Development of China, outlines his plan industrialize China, to increase the standard of living of the Chinese people through the provision of foreign capital, technology, and expertise. Professor Cho-Ming Lee, a member of China’s delegation to Bretton Woods, the largest delegation next to that the U.S., put it this way: only by industrializing the country will the living standards of the people be appreciatively raised and the economic strength of the nation rapidly developed.

Representatives of China maintained a collaborative dialogue with U.S. Treasury officials, White and Morgenthau, and had input in the final articles of the Bretton Woods conference. In a communique to the head of the Chinese delegation, Hsiang-His Kung, in September 1943, Morgenthau wrote that U.S. technical experts shave indicated considerable interest in the views…expressed in these proposals, particularly with regard to the desirability of giving special consideration to the needs of China and countries in a similar position.

On American expert on Asian affairs, wrote just after the conference:

The promotion of foreign investment and international trade, development of productive resources and the raising of standard of living, as enunciated in Article I of the Articles of Agreement of the International Bank, admirably fit in with the goal of the third of [China’s] Three People’s Principles, the Principle of the People’s Livelihood. It will be a particular source of pride to foreign admirers of doctor Dr. Sun Yat-sen, as well as to all Chinese, that a concrete scheme born out of the world’s exigencies of the ‘beginning of the end’ of World War II should follow the lines laid down by the Father of the Chinese Republic…and the respective needs of China and of the industrial and of the industrial countries of the West.

President Richard Nixon dining with Premiere Zhou Enlai in Shanghai, 1972. (Courtesy X.com)

Helleiner reports that U.S. military advisors traveled to the headquarters of the Communist Party of China in Yenan, during the month of July 1944, the final month of the Bretton Woods Conference. The first official contact between the U.S. and the Communist Party of China occurred after the conference. In November 1944, when a U.S. Treasury official surreptitiously met with top Chinese Communist official, Chou En-lai. Chou noted that with regard to China’s post war position, her greatest economic need would be for foreign capital. Exactly what President Roosevelt intended to provide with his new Bretton Woods. The untimely death of President Roosevelt on April 12, 1945, was a tragedy for the world because it prevented those intentions from being realized.

It should be obvious to any intelligent and unbiased observer that the U.S. and China have much in common. America became  a mighty industrialized economy by applying Hamilton’s economic principles, which it has tragically abandoned over the last half century. Dring that same time period, China has achieved the fastest rate of economic growth of any nation in history, by applying the principles of state-led industrialization. Would not collaboration between these economic powers serve the self-interest of each, and that of all nations in the world?

Conclusions

  • There is no historical foundation for antagonism between China and the U.S.
  • Strengthening institutions for the purpose of lending long term productive credits is paramount to achieving industrialization and economic growth, which ensures peace.
  • There is an inherently shared sovereign self-interest of every nation to raise the standard of living of all nations in an expanding developing world.
  • Statesman, and President, Franklin Roosevelt understood in creating the IRDB-The Bank-as a primary feature of the Bretton Woods system, that it was in the self-interest of the America, not to be a super-power hegemon, but instead a facilitator for economic growth for the less developed nations.
  • There is a common purpose for China and the U.S., as economic powers, to lead in engendering prosperity throughout the globe, particularly promoting economic growth in the Global South.
  • President Roosevelt demonstrated that under qualified leadership, U.S. collaboration with China is more than feasible.
  1. Forgotten Foundations of Brenton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Postwar Order

Read below my earlier post on this topic.

Franklin Roosevelt Intended to Industrialize the ‘Global South’: The Case of Ethiopia

Will China’s Global Governance Initiative Replace The West’s Failed “Rules Based Order?”

Lawrence Freeman is a Political-Economic Analyst for Africa, who has been involved in economic development policies for Africa for over 35 years. He is a teacher, writer, public speaker, consultant on Africa, and an analyst of global strategic relations. Mr. Freeman strongly believes that economic development is an essential human right. He is the creator of the blog: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld.com, also publishes on: lawrencefreeman.substack.com, “Freeman’s Africa and the World, and on X @lkfreemansafrica